I remember that happening but can't understand what new evidence has been presented to nail them after all this time. I watch all the 'Cold Cases' on Netflix and there always seems to be these things in common . . . someone decides to look at cases again where there has been a prime suspect that wasn't able to be taken to court because there wasn't enough evidence. But with the advances in DNA analysis over the years, they manage to get the evidence to convict. But it doesn't seem to be the case with this? I heard that these two were the prime suspects all those years ago, so why couldn't they be taken to court then?
I know this has been a cold case for many years, but what evidence do they even have for this case?
Its featured on many TV shows that i can recall.
Yes I cant understand why its taken so long as well. Its dragged on for years.
Recently did a trip to Tauranga, certainly jogged the old memory as we passed by
Every time i travel to Auckland i think of the same thing driving past!