A controversial plan to refreeze the Arctic is seeing promising results.

[zqwerty]

A controversial plan to refreeze the Arctic is seeing promising results. But scientists warn of big risks

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/12/12/clima...index.html

[harm_less]

A controversial plan to refreeze the Arctic is seeing promising results. But scientists warn of big risks

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/12/12/clima...index.html

They have been successful on 44,000 square feet which is just over a third of a hectare, then 430,000 Square feet or 4 hectares. Have they got no idea of the scale of what they're trying to address?

[zqwerty]

Grasping at straws?

[Oh_hunnihunni]

Every journey starts with...

I saw something about this recently, a 60 minutes doco I think. Interesting science.

[harm_less]

I saw something about the silica beads mentioned in the article. Same challenge in that the area to be covered was immense and unrealistic in practice. Of course we could just all stop burning stuff.

[nzoomed]

A controversial plan to refreeze the Arctic is seeing promising results. But scientists warn of big risks

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/12/12/clima...index.html

They have been successful on 44,000 square feet which is just over a third of a hectare, then 430,000 Square feet or 4 hectares. Have they got no idea of the scale of what they're trying to address?

I'm not sure how something like that could scale up either, plus the energy required in such a remote place would prove difficult.

[Lilith7]

Why not; at this point it has to be worth a try.