07-03-2022, 04:34 PM
(07-03-2022, 04:10 PM)king1 Wrote:Maybe.(07-03-2022, 10:51 AM)ObeWan Wrote: The Coster Gambit?i'm not so sure - if one did want to lull protesters/occupiers into a false sense of security, then a response of "I don't know" is probably the only response one could give...
Bullshit!
One of the last questions Tame put to him in the first interview was:
“How does this play out, how does it end?”
Costers answer was: “ I don’t know”.
Tame pressed him again: “You dont know?”
If he had a strategy, a plan, a gambit in place at that point or even if he wanted to send a subtle message to the protesters wouldn’t his answer to that question have been more along the lines of:
“We, are monitoring activities among the camp very closely and if things continue to escalate or if we see an increase in illegal activity or if there is a real danger to the Wellington public we will need to reassess what is required from us.”
Would have been a damm sight more forceful than “I dont know”.
I bet the protesters were quivering in fear hearing that.
Coster’s gambit?
Pffft!!
But doesn’t the “false sense of security” theory fall thru the floor a little when we know the protesters knew exactly the time and day when the cops were coming?
There were ripples running thru the camp and they were up and prepared for it at 3.30am.