Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Found not guilty, self defence, after cutting off a finger?
#3
"Mann said it only took one punch by Shaun Burr to floor the large teenager the men were so afraid of.

But the Burrs did not stop there and kept punching.

Then, William Burr introduced the piece of wood as a weapon, which was not defensive behaviour, she said.

When the boy did put both his hands on his head and let go of the knife, neither William Burr or Shaun Burr stopped or grabbed it – they just kept hitting him."


Surely that's well beyond self defence - once he was on the floor, they only needed to restrain him & call the cops rather than continuing to beat him - & cutting off a finger was well out of order, there was absolutely no need for that.
in order to be old & wise, you must first be young & stupid. (I'm still working on that.)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Found not guilty, self defence, after cutting off a finger? - by Lilith7 - 11-05-2022, 07:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)