Pfizer admits vaccine not tested to prevent transmission

[SueDonim]

Pfizer admitted in a Dutch court that it wasn't tested for transmission.
Apparently this isint "news" it was something that was always accepted.
Thats the whole point isint it?
Seems it was only tested for safety, not effectivness in transmission.
It even admits this here:
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/20...rial-noth/

"Pfizer did not claim that a clinical trial for its COVID-19 vaccine was testing whether the vaccine prevented transmission of the coronavirus to other people. The aim of the drug trial was to study whether the vaccine was safe and if it prevented disease from SARS-CoV-2."

This is what the video i posted claims, that it was never tested for preventing transmission.

You are the one who is completely missing the point. 

Vaccines prevent infection.  If you are not infected you will not transmit.  There was never any suggestion that vaccines prevented transmission once a person was infected.

This. Repeat 100 times: "Vaccines prevent infection.  If you are not infected you will not transmit.  There was never any suggestion that vaccines prevented transmission once a person was infected."

The anti-vaxxers always miss the point. Either they have insufficient understanding to read critically or they deliberately twist things to make "points" that don't exist.

And just because one person can say they were unvaccinated and only had mild disease, doesn't change the fact that they might not have had it at all had they been vaccinated. Recovering from a mild illness was just good luck at that level.