31-10-2022, 08:52 PM
(31-10-2022, 03:42 PM)C_T_Russell Wrote:(23-10-2022, 12:09 PM)Praktica Wrote: Well down the rabbit hole there, CT - if you think that The Platform and The BFD are believeable sources, you're too far gone to be helped.
Just shows you cant have listened to the interview, because Sean Plunket was actually giving this poor funeral director a grilling, he essentially didnt believe him, I was quite disappointed with him.
(25-10-2022, 12:31 PM)SueDonim Wrote: How many times do you need to be told that these "sources" are just fantasy rubbish? You lose credibility for your otherwise sensible posts when you keep hammering this stuff. If you want to be taken seriously and be part of a discussion, your views need to have some basis in reason.Of course they are going to say that to get everyone the jab, but please find me the data of those who dies of covid blood clots?
See this for some real information https://healthcare.utah.edu/healthfeed/p...ovid19.php.
Including ... "...[snip] The risk of developing a blood clot from COVID-19 infection is far higher than getting a blood clot from a COVID-19 vaccine".
Read that 100 times and understand what it means - the risk of getting covid is far higher than the risk of having a blood clot - or any other side effect.
I cant find any.
Vaccination data. Not dying of blood clots, but being recorded as having them https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/saf...ort-45.asp
Look down to the heading Adverse events of special interest. There are numbers of thrombosis recorded related to vaccines (eg 61 and 126 - out of over 11 million doses of vaccine) as well as the normal number per year (2863 and 519).
Post covid. It's easy enough to search the literature and find reports of studies, eg https://www.webmd.com/dvt/news/20220407/...t-6-months. There are lots of numbers but this sentence is pertinent "those with COVID-19 had a five times' higher risk of DVT; a 33-fold higher risk of pulmonary embolism" - compared to people who haven't had covid.