08-11-2022, 11:54 AM
(08-11-2022, 11:39 AM)jilledge Wrote:(08-11-2022, 11:34 AM)king1 Wrote: i'm sure they had their reasons for excluding riparian planting, shelter belts etc There has to be some limitations in the ETS otherwise you would probably end up with an exploited system that doesn't achieve the aims that it was designed to achieve. Natives are ok as far as I can tell, as long as they meet the requirements... (post 1990 for natives by the looks of it)
There doesn't appear to be any logical reason to exclude them - they often take up hectares and hectares of land, and sequest a lot of carbon. However the Govt. appears intent on turning good food producing land into scorched earth with pinus radiata sitting on top of it.
It is simply another example of the Govt. not actually knowing what they are doing and refusing to accept that others know better - hence the one source of truth comment. They are horrendous.
I might accept that if it had solely been a decision of this government, but the ETS has been around since well before the present government. Many governments including National led, have guided it and presumably many millions were spent on consultants over the years to get to where we are now... just kind of feel it's a bit disingenuous to blame a single person for it...
You do sound like you have a pre 1990 native forest in the backyard...
This world would be a perfect place if it wasn't for the people.
Sharesies | Buy Crypto | Surfshark VPN | Cloud Backup
Sharesies | Buy Crypto | Surfshark VPN | Cloud Backup