11-11-2022, 10:14 AM
(07-11-2022, 08:59 AM)jilledge Wrote: I agree, it's weird that they don't permit natives to be part of the carbon sequestration equation.Yup, it makes no sense. Farmers also cant even claim credits for any trees such as shelter belts planted.
(07-11-2022, 12:09 PM)Oh_hunnihunni Wrote:This is partially true, if the forest is planted for the timber, but now we are seeing permanent forests with pines. Totally pointless.(07-11-2022, 08:59 AM)jilledge Wrote: I agree, it's weird that they don't permit natives to be part of the carbon sequestration equation.
Probably because they do not hold the same quick buck potential.
Btw, nice to see you, to see you nice...
I think the other reason is the fact they grow faster and will absorb more carbon in a shorter time so will save the planet "faster"
Thats the perception anyway, but natives are hardwoods, and hold more carbon in the long term.