16-11-2022, 06:34 PM
(16-11-2022, 05:55 PM)C_T_Russell Wrote:Jacinda is our prime minister. Her role, among other things, is to foster a beneficial social and business climate that is conducive to our country's businesses but not to invest in their operations. You seem to be confusing our country's governing with that of a totalitarian communist state.(11-11-2022, 12:46 PM)harm_less Wrote: Careful what you criticise there chap. What you're stating there is the perfect condemnation of NZ's primary produce. We are as far from most of our international markets than any country can be so we'll always be behind the 8 ball when promoting our food exports to a world that is increasingly aware of the environmental impact of its consumption (i.e. food miles).
This is on top of the fact that we're producing way more than our population can consume so we are effectively bearing responsibility for the emissions of millions of consumers worldwide. If forcing those customers to pay more for their food to offset the ETS taxes paid by farmers to grow that food that seems to be a relatively fair trade off and if international sales demand for our produce reduces as a result then our farming inputs may reduce. Sounds like a workable solution either way, so long as the extra income in the former is focussed into environmental improvements.
Good point, dont you see the hypocrisy?
All that oil being burned to export all our goods, but the govt will turn a blind eye to all of that and instead worry about the cows farts.
How about Jacinda buys some sailing ships? We used to import and export everything that way once upon a time before coal and oil were used.