13-04-2023, 12:36 AM
"Clump of cells", "foetus", "not actually a baby": these are all just obfuscations to desperately cling to the barbaric notion that it is OK to deliberately kill certain humans for the sake of convenience.
If abortion is OK because "its not yet a baby", why isn't it OK to kill an unwanted newborn baby because "it's not yet a child/adolescent/adult"?
And no "zealots are keen to murder woman". That is hyperbole bordering on the deliberately dishonest. Essentially no one would argue that a mother should have to go through with a pregnancy where doing so will result in the death of the mother and child (e.g. ectopic). And, if you're referring to potential deaths of mothers from dodgy illegal back-alley abortions, does that mean that if a home invader breaks his neck trying to climb through a second story window, they were "murdered" by the homeowner who wouldn't let them through the front door?
If abortion is OK because "its not yet a baby", why isn't it OK to kill an unwanted newborn baby because "it's not yet a child/adolescent/adult"?
And no "zealots are keen to murder woman". That is hyperbole bordering on the deliberately dishonest. Essentially no one would argue that a mother should have to go through with a pregnancy where doing so will result in the death of the mother and child (e.g. ectopic). And, if you're referring to potential deaths of mothers from dodgy illegal back-alley abortions, does that mean that if a home invader breaks his neck trying to climb through a second story window, they were "murdered" by the homeowner who wouldn't let them through the front door?