Blood clots in corpses make them difficult to embalm

[king1]

It looked to me like the article was just presenting an overview of a study conducted by 

is the interpretation of the results presented by the SWPRS you take issue with or the results of the study by the german pathologists?

My suspicion was aroused when a 12 month old article by a "policy" publication is quoting pathologists who don't seem to have had the work published in a peer reviewed medical journal. I didn't look too hard so may have missed it, but the references to their work seem to all be on the fringe.

Personally, I think the quote I pulled from the article is probably about right ("To what extent can a severe or even a mild coronavirus infection cause similar endothelial damage?..."). It's a pity they then went back on that concept.

Not sure what the age of the research has to do with it, being 12 months old seems irrelevant.  

But we are suspicious of the researchers, the publishers, the fact checkers, and wikipedia - they all get called into question.  Would a peer review actually make that much difference to some folks, Would you accept the research/evidence if it is peer reviewed?