06-10-2023, 02:14 PM
I'm not at all concerned with whether or not he is sufficiently academically qualified to be a politician/cabinet minister etc. I have an "unqualified" staff member who is great, and another with a relevant bachelors who is pretty hopeless. So I well know that subsequent experience generally counts for far more than academic study carried out years ago.
My concern with Shaw is with regard to his integrity and honesty. He lied about the BA, there is no question about that. With regard to entrance to the MA, he may well have followed the correct process, submitted valid documentation and just received special dispensation to enter without the required academic prerequisite, however why doesn't he just come out and say that?
My concern with Shaw is with regard to his integrity and honesty. He lied about the BA, there is no question about that. With regard to entrance to the MA, he may well have followed the correct process, submitted valid documentation and just received special dispensation to enter without the required academic prerequisite, however why doesn't he just come out and say that?