24-06-2024, 01:55 PM
Ok got ya, looking at that data i suspect that its different hardware configurations that are affecting those results.
Makes me wonder if higher end systems with lower latency memory may be a factor on all of this?
Its not really reliable to compare so many submitted results when there can be so many factors at play in configuration, there is more of a wider variance than whats typical.
It is interesting that there is quite a spike towards the end of 20,000.
Perhaps if they had more data submitted, it might be more accurate, but you should see a spike on the chart, my 4790K has the same peak showing too.
Perhaps this is because its an older CPU and they have more data available?
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu...Hz&id=2275
Makes me wonder if higher end systems with lower latency memory may be a factor on all of this?
Its not really reliable to compare so many submitted results when there can be so many factors at play in configuration, there is more of a wider variance than whats typical.
It is interesting that there is quite a spike towards the end of 20,000.
Perhaps if they had more data submitted, it might be more accurate, but you should see a spike on the chart, my 4790K has the same peak showing too.
Perhaps this is because its an older CPU and they have more data available?
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu...Hz&id=2275