06-08-2025, 03:18 PM
(06-08-2025, 01:35 PM)SueDonim Wrote:(01-08-2025, 12:42 PM)Lilith7 Wrote: Politiciians have been targets for criticsm, & humour,often in the form of satire for well over a hundred years. At least the 1700's in the UK (Punch magazine being one of the first) & the USA.
And given some of their actions & consequences of them, I think thats unlikely to change.
Unless they do, of course...
I have no problem with satire. It's very cleaver when it's properly done and can "say" far more than simple criticism. I'm familiar with Punch. I have some volumes from the 19thC.
I have no problem with specific criticism of specific politicians for specific actions or intentions - when the actions or intentions quoted are true and are the responsibility of the person being criticised.
I do have a problem with blindly calling everyone in a group of people bastards whether they are or not and criticising people en masse when some are likely to be there for the express reason of trying to do the right thing for society. They deserve support, guidance and thanks, not to be called bastards just because you disagree with them.
Well...then we disagree, imo this govt like the 80's govt which included Rioger Douglas. are in fact precisely that. Hell bent on doing as much damage as they can during their term. Which, with any luck will be their only one....

in order to be old & wise, you must first be young & stupid. (I'm still working on that.)