Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
BSA vs Winnie and The Platform
#1
Why shouldn't podcasts be subject to the same rules as TV/Radio etc


Quote:The NZ First leader is accusing the Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA) of "Soviet era stasi" censorship, following a decision to begin regulating podcasts and online media.
Winston Peters posted on social media saying it was "blatant overreach" by the BSA and "highly concerning", and demanded an explanation for their "recent outrageous action".
"Why does the Broadcasting Standards Authority think they can make up their own rules in secret meetings to act like some Soviet era stasi."
The Free Speech Union later put out a release about the decision to start "regulating podcasters such as Sean Plunket", saying it was a move "far beyond its legal mandate."
A complaint sent by the BSA to The Platform has been published on the online platform's website, outlining concerns raised about allegedly "unacceptable racist comments".
The letter from the BSA states it "has found it has jurisdiction" to consider a complaint about The Platform's live talkback programme on the basis the transmission of the programme met the definition of 'broadcasting' in the Act.
The complaint itself relates to concerns about what the complainant alleges were "unacceptable racist comments" in The Platform's 22 July 2025 programme, the letter stated.
When the listener first complained to The Platform, the online media organisation responded: "You Plonker we aren't subject to the Broadcasting Standards Authority".

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/576...censorship
This world would be a perfect place if it wasn't for the people.

Sharesies | Buy Crypto | Surfshark VPN | Cloud Backup
Reply


Messages In This Thread
BSA vs Winnie and The Platform - by king1 - Yesterday, 10:30 PM
RE: BSA vs Winnie and The Platform - by Agent_24 - Yesterday, 11:30 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)