Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
S. Wiles & S. Hendy, claim against Auckland uni
#51
CT, where does personal choice stop and social cost begin?

Should the individual be expected - mandated even, to observe certain hygiene standards in order to prevent the spread of disease, or should everyone be able to shit wherever they choose?

The trouble with this vax thing is a single choice to remain medical procedurally inviolate could prove disastrous for other human beings. Fatal in fact. This reality is proven now repeatedly across the world, where the unvaccinated are providing a vector for the virus into vulnerable populations, so that not only does it do its job and threaten the health of innocents, but it has the opportunity to mutate and get better at killing people. Currently at around 5 million I believe - not counting the unverified and unreported fatalities.

Seeing the vax poses a threat grossly outweighed by the virus itself, do you not see that choosing to be unvaccinated is actually an attack on the society that we all choose to be part of, and choose to benefit from? Do you not see why the huge majority 90% plus of the population who are now vaccinated regard those who choose to be outliers as not just threats, but ignorant, uneducated, selfish, and rather pathetic individuals the rest of us can actually do without...
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: S. Wiles & S. Hendy, claim against Auckland uni - by Oh_hunnihunni - 08-01-2022, 04:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)