regardless of what he was referring to, the writer has purposely mis-represented it.
no amount of ifs and buts can change that.
we all read the same article did we not?
please show me where mr luxon included those folks in his comments?
if you cannot, then unfortunately you are just going to have to suck it up and admit the piece is not only insincere in its intent but manipulative and malicious piece of gutter journalism.
trying to explain away the writers tawdry fantasy on this forum is to be expected, but to parrot it as verbatim fact to use against someone (politician or not) is cowardly and crass.
i think you all know it to be a piece of rubbish, but cannot get past your partisan blind faith to see or admit it.
would be better if you did, because endorsing it just makes you party to it, and doesnt display much in the way of critical thinking. not unlike someone who believes in conspiracy theories is it?
not all that good of a look.
no amount of ifs and buts can change that.
we all read the same article did we not?
please show me where mr luxon included those folks in his comments?
if you cannot, then unfortunately you are just going to have to suck it up and admit the piece is not only insincere in its intent but manipulative and malicious piece of gutter journalism.
trying to explain away the writers tawdry fantasy on this forum is to be expected, but to parrot it as verbatim fact to use against someone (politician or not) is cowardly and crass.
i think you all know it to be a piece of rubbish, but cannot get past your partisan blind faith to see or admit it.
would be better if you did, because endorsing it just makes you party to it, and doesnt display much in the way of critical thinking. not unlike someone who believes in conspiracy theories is it?
not all that good of a look.
So if you disappear out of view You know I will never say goodbye