yes, blatant untruths.
he based his whole diatribe on the first two paragraphs which were just not true.
do you think he did it by mistake?.
we can argue what mr luxon 'meant' all day long, what the writer wrote bears no discussion, its there in print.
thats who the writer thinks are bottom feeders. supermarket stockers, dental hygienists. ffs
what mr luxon thinks is up for speculation, and you can argue it until the cows come home.
but it will only be that, speculation.
the writer is succinct in who he thinks are bottom feeders.
heres some high minded thoughts on venom and vitriol for you.
https://tmmb.co.nz/forums/showthread.php...ht=vitriol
and what is posted elsewhere is not what i want to see posted here,
a bunch of one sided fantasy hit pieces disguised as political discourse. why not throw in a couple of anonymous tweets and a meme to top it off?
it is not about policy, it is not about character, it is gossip, and no different at all to what is said about mr gayford, none
whats good for the goose..
there is more truth in saying ms ardern has a horse face
than in what mr campbell has speculated about what mr luxon intentions
i dont think theres a place for either comment, but im happy to abide and play along too
i thought it was off the menu, just in the name of decency if nowt else
[Removed: Rule 2F]
anything goes?
he based his whole diatribe on the first two paragraphs which were just not true.
do you think he did it by mistake?.
we can argue what mr luxon 'meant' all day long, what the writer wrote bears no discussion, its there in print.
thats who the writer thinks are bottom feeders. supermarket stockers, dental hygienists. ffs
what mr luxon thinks is up for speculation, and you can argue it until the cows come home.
but it will only be that, speculation.
the writer is succinct in who he thinks are bottom feeders.
heres some high minded thoughts on venom and vitriol for you.
https://tmmb.co.nz/forums/showthread.php...ht=vitriol
and what is posted elsewhere is not what i want to see posted here,
a bunch of one sided fantasy hit pieces disguised as political discourse. why not throw in a couple of anonymous tweets and a meme to top it off?
it is not about policy, it is not about character, it is gossip, and no different at all to what is said about mr gayford, none
whats good for the goose..
there is more truth in saying ms ardern has a horse face
than in what mr campbell has speculated about what mr luxon intentions
i dont think theres a place for either comment, but im happy to abide and play along too
i thought it was off the menu, just in the name of decency if nowt else
[Removed: Rule 2F]
anything goes?
So if you disappear out of view You know I will never say goodbye