im not one for research, so my conclusions are anecdotal at best, but i think i can cut to the heart of the matter with some confidence..
i know a line of bullshit when i hear it.
1) yes he has a doctorate, so did that hairy legged hag down timaru way issuing exemptions.
so does jack karvorkian, mengele had a doctorate from that noble institution of learning the university of munich.
(wasnt a medical doctorate either from memory.)
a doctorate is not a character reference, and irrelevant to mr campbells credentials as a peer reviewed specialist dispensing health advice on the internet.
2) mr campbell uses excellent resources, peer reviewed even, then makes leaps and assumptions based on what he has read. He then offers medical conclusions as researched fact, it is not. it is an interpretation (his) of those documents he has chosen to read.
3) Chosen to read? yes, mr campbell is not averse at all to not acknowledging counter science to his 'theories', just the bits that suit his message. im not going to mention iver fucking mectin again.
4) He fuels fuckwits. His 'opinions' are parroted everywhere. the 'over reporting of numbers'. Honestly i dont know where to start with this criminal. he has accused pfizer of causing over a thousand deaths. the moron forgot to say what caused the deaths was not necessarily vaccine or even covid ffs. imbecile. the list goes on.
5) He is a Youtube manifestation (some might say infestation), he was in the right place at the right time, again not a qualification as specialist or researcher. just a youtuber. views are not votes, nor are they endorsements, to mr campbell they are money, pure and unpolished, the great motivator. be sure to hit the like button and ring the notification bell.
6) He passes off his conclusions as science, but they are not peer reviewed, and no more science than casting spells. much of his sourcework is not peer reviewed, and he quotes it as fact. next time youre chatting with the miserable little prick ask him about mrna and heart attacks. lies.
7) i dont like the cut of his jib, and im a very good judge of people. hes a nit picker, uses 'what about this' and 'this study says'. and argues minutia like the pro's do on the jerk circuit. He has no lips. his eyes are too close together and his mum dresses him funny.
jolly good then.
no one is immune to the algorithm, and mr campbell is just another passage into the warren.
i know a line of bullshit when i hear it.
1) yes he has a doctorate, so did that hairy legged hag down timaru way issuing exemptions.
so does jack karvorkian, mengele had a doctorate from that noble institution of learning the university of munich.
(wasnt a medical doctorate either from memory.)
a doctorate is not a character reference, and irrelevant to mr campbells credentials as a peer reviewed specialist dispensing health advice on the internet.
2) mr campbell uses excellent resources, peer reviewed even, then makes leaps and assumptions based on what he has read. He then offers medical conclusions as researched fact, it is not. it is an interpretation (his) of those documents he has chosen to read.
3) Chosen to read? yes, mr campbell is not averse at all to not acknowledging counter science to his 'theories', just the bits that suit his message. im not going to mention iver fucking mectin again.
4) He fuels fuckwits. His 'opinions' are parroted everywhere. the 'over reporting of numbers'. Honestly i dont know where to start with this criminal. he has accused pfizer of causing over a thousand deaths. the moron forgot to say what caused the deaths was not necessarily vaccine or even covid ffs. imbecile. the list goes on.
5) He is a Youtube manifestation (some might say infestation), he was in the right place at the right time, again not a qualification as specialist or researcher. just a youtuber. views are not votes, nor are they endorsements, to mr campbell they are money, pure and unpolished, the great motivator. be sure to hit the like button and ring the notification bell.
6) He passes off his conclusions as science, but they are not peer reviewed, and no more science than casting spells. much of his sourcework is not peer reviewed, and he quotes it as fact. next time youre chatting with the miserable little prick ask him about mrna and heart attacks. lies.
7) i dont like the cut of his jib, and im a very good judge of people. hes a nit picker, uses 'what about this' and 'this study says'. and argues minutia like the pro's do on the jerk circuit. He has no lips. his eyes are too close together and his mum dresses him funny.
jolly good then.
no one is immune to the algorithm, and mr campbell is just another passage into the warren.
So if you disappear out of view You know I will never say goodbye