Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Say no to 3 waters
#4
(01-06-2022, 08:42 AM)king1 Wrote: well if privatisation of assets is a concern you can rest easy

Quote:The Government’s Three Waters Reforms are proposing to shift the current 67 council-owned and operated three waters services into four new publicly-owned entities to manage the future delivery of these services
https://www.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/F...amme-2022/$file/Three-Waters-Reform-boiled-down-1.pdf

Quote:These new entities will be publicly-owned by councils on behalf of communities, with strong protections against any future privatisation
https://www.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/F...amme-2022/$file/Three-Waters-Reform-boiled-down-1.pdf

The other side of this debate is here if anyone is interested
https://www.dia.govt.nz/Three-Waters-Reform-Programme
Yes ive read all that and most people will just skim over it without looking deeper.

If they really cared about preventing privatization, then why did they allow the provision for that very thing to happen if 75% of the boards vote to pass that?
There should not be any provision whether voted in or not, it should be legally written to prohibit any sale or transfer of the assets to a commercial enterprise.
One only needs to look to Australia where Chinese corporations control and own water resources over there.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Say no to 3 waters - by C_T_Russell - 01-06-2022, 01:19 AM
RE: Say no to 3 waters - by Praktica - 01-06-2022, 08:22 AM
RE: Say no to 3 waters - by king1 - 01-06-2022, 08:42 AM
RE: Say no to 3 waters - by C_T_Russell - 02-06-2022, 11:47 AM
RE: Say no to 3 waters - by king1 - 02-06-2022, 12:46 PM
RE: Say no to 3 waters - by C_T_Russell - 02-06-2022, 01:55 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)