Luxon

[Lilith7]

all your doing is trying to deflect the conversation away from the real issue ( Mr Luxon comment about bottom feeders for clarity - since you seem to conveniently misinterpret everything someone says). 

Who you or I or Lilith conjure up when thinking of bottom feeders is completely irrelevant.  What matters is the perception that individuals have of the comments and they are entirely personal to the individual. 

I would hazard you're only motivation of this questioning to Lilith is to deflect/attack/discredit.  Rather than holding Mr Luxon accountable for his actions...

I was genuinely curious but if she is incapable of answering and needs you to defend her....

Luxon made the comment - however Mr Campbell made the leap.  You can spin that all you like but this thread isn't about holding Luxon to account it was trying to tie Mr Cambells comment to Luxon.

Once again - when this term is used by politicians it generally means those on low incomes, so when I hear a politician use it, I tend to - as I said earlier - see it as yet another out of touch politician having a go at the easiest target.
And as far as I recall, I've never heard anyone other than politicians use it.

Imo all politicians should be obliged to spend 3 months over winter surviving on the lowest income with no other funding permitted, at least every two or so years. Then they'll have some understanding of the reality for many of those they want to vote for them.