(25-10-2022, 11:24 PM)C_T_Russell Wrote:If the word 'as' is removed it totally changes what I was claiming. Try again...(25-10-2022, 04:52 PM)harm_less Wrote: If you are interpretting what I've written earlier being promotion of intensive farming in regard to greenhouse emissions then your problem is one of comprehension of what you're reading. That's a risky weakness to have if you're assimilating information from CT online content. Far too easy to get the wrong end of the stick, which may explain a few things.
you said:
"The solution is to mitigate CO2 and methane production as in activities like intensive farming and transportation we are discharging far more of it than the carbon cycle is able to cope with"
If you removed the "as" it would have made total sense.
Anyway, our methane production is a drop in the bucket and is not going to make tiddly squat.
Its purely political why Jacinda wants to do this.
The solution is to mitigate CO2 and methane production because in activities like intensive farming and transportation we are discharging far more of it than the carbon cycle is able to cope with.
Do you comprehend my point now?