26-10-2022, 01:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 26-10-2022, 05:24 PM by C_T_Russell.)
(26-10-2022, 08:41 AM)harm_less Wrote:(25-10-2022, 11:24 PM)C_T_Russell Wrote: you said:If the word 'as' is removed it totally changes what I was claiming. Try again...
"The solution is to mitigate CO2 and methane production as in activities like intensive farming and transportation we are discharging far more of it than the carbon cycle is able to cope with"
If you removed the "as" it would have made total sense.
Anyway, our methane production is a drop in the bucket and is not going to make tiddly squat.
Its purely political why Jacinda wants to do this.
The solution is to mitigate CO2 and methane production because in activities like intensive farming and transportation we are discharging far more of it than the carbon cycle is able to cope with.
Do you comprehend my point now?
I took it that you meant intensive farming was a way to mitigate CO2 emissions as an example.
Anyway, intensive factory indoor farming is promoted as an environmentally friendly way to produce meat.
I couldnt think of anything worse.
Edit:
I also had this article come my way, looks like regenerative farming is set for failure.
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/green-dream-p...s-into-red