Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tim Jago loses name supression
#7
(01-02-2025, 07:03 AM)Oh_hunnihunni Wrote: So, Seymour - in suggesting an employment lawyer, saw sexual abuse as a potential employment law issue?

Weirdness.

Or Seymour saw a lawyer as the first point of action for a potential case for legal action. He just overlooked the breed of lawyer he was recommending. If so it does say much for his knowledge of legal matters, and this is the MP attempting to interfere with the Treaty Rolleyes


Messages In This Thread
Tim Jago loses name supression - by harm_less - 31-01-2025, 07:41 PM
RE: Tim Jago loses name supression - by king1 - 31-01-2025, 07:50 PM
RE: Tim Jago loses name supression - by harm_less - 31-01-2025, 08:27 PM
RE: Tim Jago loses name supression - by king1 - 31-01-2025, 09:55 PM
RE: Tim Jago loses name supression - by king1 - 31-01-2025, 07:56 PM
RE: Tim Jago loses name supression - by harm_less - 01-02-2025, 07:51 AM
RE: Tim Jago loses name supression - by Lilith7 - 01-02-2025, 10:47 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)