12-06-2025, 04:13 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-06-2025, 04:14 PM by Oh_hunnihunni.)
Those pay equity claims are hamstrung, as you know, by the changes that make comparisons - upon which equity demonstrations rely - very difficult to make. Clever, but not exactly fair.
Charges of out of control public spending - a phrase without any real back up - can be leveled at any regime. Especially if it is made without regard to the downstream effect of cuts made purportedly to rein in such spending.
Tax cuts for landlords was a sop to a group who lobbied hard, and one to which a majority of Nat MPs actually belong. And, far as I know, legitimate businesses have taxes applied legitimately, maybe you could offer a comparable group of businesses that received the same tax cuts - hoteliers for example? And no, they didn't...
Next?
Definitely the one who knocks...
Charges of out of control public spending - a phrase without any real back up - can be leveled at any regime. Especially if it is made without regard to the downstream effect of cuts made purportedly to rein in such spending.
Tax cuts for landlords was a sop to a group who lobbied hard, and one to which a majority of Nat MPs actually belong. And, far as I know, legitimate businesses have taxes applied legitimately, maybe you could offer a comparable group of businesses that received the same tax cuts - hoteliers for example? And no, they didn't...
Next?
Definitely the one who knocks...