10 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 10 hours ago by Oh_hunnihunni.)
(Yesterday, 11:12 AM)C_T_Russell Wrote:(11-10-2025, 05:23 PM)Oh_hunnihunni Wrote: Winston deliberately drew attention to something in Doyle's private life. With malice aforethought.
I wonder how he would feel if his much gossiped about early history with exceedingly young women was given the same treatment?
Doyle is unsafe to be around children, if you bothered to look at those photos he posted.
Meanwhile it turns out winston has been harassed by protesters outside his home for the last 18 months.
We also have to deal with Chloe standing by the person who released his address.
Turns out she is featured in the ONE NZ commercials on TV and now One NZ is removing the ads featuring her, so thumbs up ONE NZ for not being woke.
You have absolutely no reason to declare Doyle unsafe around children. It is an hideous slur to make on the basis of a malicious bit of political scheming by someone whose own ethics do not bear up under close scrutiny.
Imagine if some anonymous internet stranger put that kind of thing on a public forum about you?
At least the political hatchet man did it openly so we could all judge his agenda...
Btw, his address and his girlfriend's are publicly available on the net for anyone to look into. Don't blame Chloe, she pointed that fact out to the media. The burglar who handed himself in to the police has clearly stated he was not part of the protest action so stop aligning the two events.
And, those one nz ads? Google it you silly sausage. It isn't Chloe's association with one nz as you intimate, but the actress Acacia O'Connor. If you have to malign folk you don't know, at least make it really clear who you are referring to...