Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
120 families lose access to respite care but 'not a cut'
#1
Despite the clear similarity to an actual cut, this is apparently not a cut. At all. Not even slightly. Rolleyes


120 Wellington families have lost access to respite care support, but according to ministers this is not a cut - because the programme's budget was intact.

Dodgy

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/5285...-not-a-cut
in order to be old & wise, you must first be young & stupid. (I'm still working on that.)
Reply
#2
(4 hours ago)Lilith7 Wrote: Despite the clear similarity to an actual cut, this is apparently not a cut. At all. Not even slightly. Rolleyes


120 Wellington families have lost access to respite care support, but according to ministers this is not a cut - because the programme's budget was intact.

Dodgy

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/5285...-not-a-cut

It's more a case of Luxon's ministers singing from his hymn sheet in playing loosely with the meanings and context of the words they use. The thread I've just posted on Luxon's hissy fit about 'frickin targets' is a prime example of this behaviour.
Reply
#3
I SO wish we had McPhail & Gadsby still....
in order to be old & wise, you must first be young & stupid. (I'm still working on that.)
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)