Luxon's 'negative, wet, windy' comment

[Wainuiguy]

You're the one who drew attention to it and posted about it. Now the numbers don't work for you reject it?  Oh my.

Do you really not get that those in agreement will almost certainly be of the right wing variety or is it just convenient to ignore that?

2 3rds or respondents agreed.  I think you tried to draw attention now don't like that many agree.   So must be "Right wing".

[Lilith7]

Do you really not get that those in agreement will almost certainly be of the right wing variety or is it just convenient to ignore that?

2 3rds or respondents agreed.  I think you tried to draw attention now don't like that many agree.   So must be "Right wing".

So just prefer to ignore that they will almost certainly be right wing, then.

[Wainuiguy]

2 3rds or respondents agreed.  I think you tried to draw attention now don't like that many agree.   So must be "Right wing".

So just prefer to ignore that they will almost certainly be right wing, then.

Can you prove that or just because the numbers went against you you are throwing it out there?  Too funny.

[harm_less]

So just prefer to ignore that they will almost certainly be right wing, then.

Can you prove that or just because the numbers went against you you are throwing it out there?  Too funny.

Seems quite apt for our own forum's 'Whinyguy' to have so much to say on the descriptor that Luxon has broadcast spawning the topic of Stuff's poll.

[Wainuiguy]

Can you prove that or just because the numbers went against you you are throwing it out there?  Too funny.

Seems quite apt for our own forum's 'Whinyguy' to have so much to say on the descriptor that Luxon has broadcast spawning the topic of Stuff's poll.

Says the whiner in chief.....

[Lilith7]

So just prefer to ignore that they will almost certainly be right wing, then.

Can you prove that or just because the numbers went against you you are throwing it out there?  Too funny.

Its just fascinating that somehow, you actually think that some of those agreeing with the right wing views expressed by a right wing political leader are in fact somehow on the left politically.

[Wainuiguy]

Can you prove that or just because the numbers went against you you are throwing it out there?  Too funny.

Its just fascinating that somehow, you actually think that some of those agreeing with the right wing views expressed by a right wing political leader are in fact somehow on the left politically.

So to confirm...no proof?

[R2x1]

We have the right wing, then we have the left wing (or vice versa) and one or other will very briefly create or promote a flap? This activity becomes a bit feverish if an election approaches.
Can anybody explain how this ritual is meant to fly?

[zqwerty]

LOL R2x1

[king1]

We have the right wing, then we have the left wing (or vice versa) and one or other will very briefly create or promote a flap?  This activity becomes a bit feverish if an election approaches.
Can anybody explain how this ritual is meant to fly?

reminds of those old birdman competitions

[nzoomed]

That's quite a negative comment from someone who wants to lead this country.

[Lilith7]

Its just fascinating that somehow, you actually think that some of those agreeing with the right wing views expressed by a right wing political leader are in fact somehow on the left politically.

So to confirm...no proof?

The fact is that mostly people with right wing views will have agreed with those views; if you prefer to ignore that for reasons best known to yourself, then that would be up to you.

[Wainuiguy]

So to confirm...no proof?

The fact is that mostly people with right wing views will have agreed with those views; if you prefer to ignore that for reasons best known to yourself, then that would be up to you.

So 2/3ds were right wing?  Doesn't bode well for the election then

[R2x1]

Responders were able to put their X on a piece of paper plonked in front of them; they may not do quite as well if they have to find a polling place, select the correct day, uncap the pen, work out which way up the form has to be and pick the box to mark when the pollster hasn't got his finger pointing out where to make the mark, all without any chance of getting paid for her/his hard work. Of course, you could up the odds by pointing out they can slip the pen in their pocket after making the sign of approval and thereby make a small but measurable untaxed profit.

[Oh_hunnihunni]

That's quite a negative comment from someone who wants to lead this country.

So far I haven't heard him make a single positive comment about anything.

[Lilith7]

That's quite a negative comment from someone who wants to lead this country.

So far I haven't heard him make a single positive comment about anything.

Jeez - he wants people to 'have more babies' - surely that's positive. 


If you ignore all the possible problems with it, & squint slightly.