Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why would you name a child
#1
...after an erotic romance novel? And a better question, why would the Registrar of Births permit such a cruelty?
Reply
#2
and here I thought it was all about anti-colonialism or some such... But yes, more thought could have been given to the name...
This world would be a perfect place if it wasn't for the people.

Sharesies | Buy Crypto | Surfshark VPN | Cloud Backup
Reply
#3
Bloody awful name, poor litle soul. I'm amazed that it was allowed, it would have made his life difficult had he survived.
in order to be old & wise, you must first be young & stupid. (I'm still working on that.)
Reply
#4
Some families should not be allowed to have children. For the sake of those children...
Reply
#5
The name itself should have been a red flag.
It's not the least charm of a theory that it is refutable. The hundred-times-refuted theory of "free will" owes its persistence to this charm alone; some one is always appearing who feels himself strong enough to refute it - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply
#6
Exactly.
Reply
#7
(27-10-2023, 11:37 AM)Oh_hunnihunni Wrote: Some families should not be allowed to have children. For the sake of those children...

No can't agree on that - too many would immediately want all poor people sterilised, on grounds of their poverty. Or, some would find other 'grounds' such as race or religion.

We're just not a very nice species sometimes.

Better if we could start by teaching people how to be good parents. The very suggestion of it though would be chucked in the 'too hard' basket.

(27-10-2023, 11:55 AM)zqwerty Wrote: The name itself should have been a red flag.

You'd think so, yet apparently not. Bizarre.
in order to be old & wise, you must first be young & stupid. (I'm still working on that.)
Reply
#8
Is there a link to the article? Can't find the story this is referencing!
Reply
#9
My faith in bureaucracy is restored... Such a pity they didn't make a call to child services.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/1331926...icial-name
Reply
#10
Storm Angel Wall is the mother....
In and out of jobs, running free
Waging war with society
Reply
#11
Intergenerational habits and attitudes are very hard to change. And we each have our own version that influences us throughout our lives. As the Jesuits say, give me the boy till the age of seven and I will show you the man...
Reply
#12
(27-10-2023, 03:30 PM)Oh_hunnihunni Wrote: My faith in bureaucracy is restored... Such a pity they didn't make a call to child services.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/1331926...icial-name



Yep, it was good to read that it wasn't quite that bad.


https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/other/rut...7cb18&ei=7
in order to be old & wise, you must first be young & stupid. (I'm still working on that.)
Reply
#13
(27-10-2023, 03:30 PM)Oh_hunnihunni Wrote: My faith in bureaucracy is restored... Such a pity they didn't make a call to child services.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/1331926...icial-name

Ok, I see. That name says alot about the maturity of the parents, that's for sure.
Reply
#14
(27-10-2023, 11:15 AM)Lilith7 Wrote: Bloody awful name, poor litle soul. I'm amazed that it was allowed, it would have made his life difficult had he survived.

sadly, i have been thinking along the lines of some of the names almost guarantee the bearer will be a victim of child abuse. its almost like the parents know the name will be in the headlines and name them based on that.
Reply
#15
(29-10-2023, 04:40 PM)girlgeorgina Wrote:
(27-10-2023, 11:15 AM)Lilith7 Wrote: Bloody awful name, poor litle soul. I'm amazed that it was allowed, it would have made his life difficult had he survived.

sadly, i have been thinking along the lines of some of the names almost guarantee the bearer will be a victim of child abuse. its almost like the parents know the name will be in the headlines and name them based on that.

That sent me looking; we know this child wasn't actually registered due to his name being rejected & I wondered what other names had been rejected elsewhere.
Interesting that one rejected here a while ago was Tallulah does the hula from Hawaii


Others eleswhere include Chow tow (smelly head) Martian, Rogue, Nutella, Mini Cooper & M3. In Oz, some rejected there include Spinach, LOL & Batrman.

https://www.khon2.com/local-news/list-of...the-world/





https://planetradio.co.uk/hits-radio/wor...nfirmed-2/


Dogs are right - humans are nuts! Big Grin Big Grin Rolleyes
in order to be old & wise, you must first be young & stupid. (I'm still working on that.)
Reply
#16
Some people think babies are possessions.
Reply
#17
Even the richest man in the world has the problem:

X Æ A-12

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technolog...baby-name/
It's not the least charm of a theory that it is refutable. The hundred-times-refuted theory of "free will" owes its persistence to this charm alone; some one is always appearing who feels himself strong enough to refute it - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply
#18
(29-10-2023, 07:55 PM)zqwerty Wrote: Even the richest man in the world has the problem:

X Æ A-12

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technolog...baby-name/

Yeah, but he's fairly clearly loony tunes. Poor kid though.
in order to be old & wise, you must first be young & stupid. (I'm still working on that.)
Reply
#19
(29-10-2023, 07:03 PM)Oh_hunnihunni Wrote: Some people think babies are possessions.

. . .  while others consider those same kids' parents are possessed . . .

Wink
Entropy is not what
it used to be.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)