Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Maha Moms'
#21
Also to make less effort because it's easier, rather like shortage supplying the marketplace to make more profit rather than supplying more goods but at a cheaper price to make the same profit.

There has to be legislation to make this happen, business men don't think of overall good just profits, ie money in the bank.
It's not the least charm of a theory that it is refutable. The hundred-times-refuted theory of "free will" owes its persistence to this charm alone; some one is always appearing who feels himself strong enough to refute it - Friedrich Nietzsche
#22
(19-01-2025, 03:21 PM)zqwerty Wrote: Also to make less effort because it's easier, rather like shortage supplying the marketplace to make more profit rather than supplying more goods but at a cheaper price to make the same profit.

There has to be legislation to make this happen, business men don't think of overall good just profits, ie money in the bank.

Yeah - that 'supply & demand' B. S. has always seemed deeply unfair to me.

More fairness needed - everywhere! Rolleyes
in order to be old & wise, you must first be young & stupid. (I'm still working on that.)
#23
(17-01-2025, 01:40 PM)harm_less Wrote:
(17-01-2025, 12:15 PM)nzoomed Wrote: Yeah i heard a fair amount on PFOA, but did not know its extent or the seriousness of the issue until I watched dark waters.
Im still concerned how some of the so called "safer" PFAS are still being used on clothing such as goretex, im not sure if they are all going to be phased out entirely from what I can tell.
Add to that the use of formaldehyde as a fabric dressing (anti-creasing agent) on a lot of imported clothing and you have a toxic environment enveloping you that increases together with skin absorption rates as body temperature rises. So many people suffer from scalp, underarm and groin irritations but fail to connect the dots in regards to their cheap beanies and underwear.

Our company sells a lot of clothing and fabric (which are dressings free) to customers, or more commonly their kids/grandkids, with skin inflammatory conditions.

Yeah thats a bad one, I had the mistake to wear a net t-shirt that I didnt wash and i broke out in a rash, it can happen.
I believe most of it will wash out after enough repeated wash cycles, but there are a number of toxic chemicals in various dyes in the clothes today, depending on the manufacturer.
#24
(14-01-2025, 11:08 AM)Lilith7 Wrote: Oh joy - it just gets worse...

Ban 'chem trails', remove fluoride, no artifical colours & 'bathe in sunlight'...

Yeah...what could possible go wrong. I did though, have to wonder about the photo of  Kirsten Louelle Gafney, who despite  wanting more natural things looks to be all fake tan & toilet teeth - but to be fair, that may be just the photo.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle...alth-trump
The FDA under Bidens administration has already banned a dangerous red food color prior to Trump going into office.
It should have been banned years ago, most of these artifical colours are dangerous and made from various chemicals.
RFK Jr will continue on from this and make America healthy again.
Ignore the chemtrail conspiracies, the media throw us "antivaxers" in with them along with the flat earthers to make us sound like loony nutjobs and discredit us.
Nothing could be further from the truth, those people are a minority thankfully.
End Wokeness Today https://x.com/EndWokeness
Unapologetic NZ first voter, white cis male, climate change skeptic.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)