Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Latest Threads |
You can never have enough...
Forum: Sewing, embroidery and knitting
Last Post: popeye333
9 minutes ago
» Replies: 8,655
» Views: 814,307
|
Things you don't hear so ...
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: zqwerty
9 hours ago
» Replies: 112
» Views: 1,848
|
Fast track bill implicati...
Forum: Opinion and Politics
Last Post: Lilith7
Yesterday, 07:13 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 77
|
The Ode to...
Forum: Opinion and Politics
Last Post: Oh_hunnihunni
Yesterday, 05:26 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 15
|
Outlook 2019 & Xtramail
Forum: PressF1
Last Post: king1
Yesterday, 03:50 PM
» Replies: 12
» Views: 79
|
What are you currently li...
Forum: Music
Last Post: Lilith7
Yesterday, 03:31 PM
» Replies: 2,480
» Views: 277,918
|
Afternoon Quiz
Forum: Puzzles & Games
Last Post: Lilith7
Yesterday, 03:14 PM
» Replies: 3,593
» Views: 516,865
|
Car Battery Replacement
Forum: PC World Chat
Last Post: allblack
Yesterday, 10:44 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 88
|
Passports; another money ...
Forum: News and Current Affairs
Last Post: Lilith7
04-05-2024, 11:11 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 40
|
Easydamus alignment test
Forum: News and Current Affairs
Last Post: Lilith7
04-05-2024, 11:05 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 25
|
|
|
Nat MP stood down |
Posted by: Lilith7 - 24-08-2023, 03:29 PM - Forum: Opinion and Politics
- Replies (7)
|
|
Tim Van de Molen has been stood down after finding he threatened a Labour MP. Not a good look so close to an election.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/496...portfolios
"National MP Tim van de Molen has been stood down from his portfolios for contempt of Parliament, after threatening behaviour towards Labour's Shanan Halbert. National leader Christopher Luxon stood the MP down after Parliament's Privileges Committee found him in contempt and recommended he be censured. The committee found van de Molen had threatened Halbert and impeded his ability to perform his duties.
Van de Molen was referred to the committee early this month after Labour's Rachel Boyack claimed he had threatened or intimidated Halbert during a Transport and Infrastructure Select Committee session in June. He was accused of standing over Halbert, which prompting other MPs to surround the Labour MP, who is chair of the Transport committee."
|
|
|
Air NZ profit 415m |
Posted by: Oh_hunnihunni - 24-08-2023, 01:39 PM - Forum: News and Current Affairs
- Replies (14)
|
|
So, are they going to pay back the government subsidies they got during the pandemic? Maybe the L o t Opposition might like to comment...
312m would buy a lot of things on the government wishlist.
|
|
|
Dress length causes rape |
Posted by: Lilith7 - 23-08-2023, 03:33 PM - Forum: News and Current Affairs
- Replies (24)
|
|
Apparently, some of us still live in the 50s. It seems that short dresses & alcohol can cause rape.
A woman who says she was raped by a taxi driver has been questioned about what she was wearing & how much she'd had to drink. By a female lawyer.
https://www.odt.co.nz/star-news/star-nat...-rape-case
"A woman who says she was kidnapped and raped in Dunedin has faced gruelling cross-examination regarding the length of her dress and the amount of alcohol she consumed.
An unregistered Dunedin taxi driver, who currently has interim name suppression, is accused of indecent assault, kidnapping, rape and two charges of sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection.
The complainant admitted she had been drinking heavily on February 8, 2021, recounting all the alcoholic beverages she consumed, some via beer bong.
"You also had tequila shots didn’t you? Which is throwing back straight alcohol isn’t it ... throwing it down your throat?" Mrs Stevens said.
CCTV images were shown of the woman and her friend eating at McDonald’s, with Mrs Stevens asking if the woman would be exposed when she sat down.
"The dress barely covers your bottom? ... I’m not being critical and I’m not suggesting that anyone could see your bottom, I’m simply exploring."
"It really wasn’t that short," the complainant said.
Mrs Stevens suggested the woman did not have any cash on her at the time of the car ride.
"The fact is you didn’t pay for the fare at all did you?"
The woman who said she was raped and strangled by the driver was clearly upset.
"No. Why would I after that?"
Tracey Ullman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51-hepLP8J4
|
|
|
ACT candidate resigns |
Posted by: Lilith7 - 23-08-2023, 03:04 PM - Forum: Opinion and Politics
- Replies (22)
|
|
After comparing covid vaccine mandates to 'concentration camps.'
The ignorance is astounding.
https://www.odt.co.nz/star-news/star-nat...centration
"An Act Party candidate has resigned after her historical comments comparing Covid-19 vaccine mandates to Nazi concentration camps came to light.
Another candidate has apologised and renounced online comments which suggested drownings were connected to the effect of the vaccine, but he has been kept on as a candidate.
Act leader David Seymour said the party’s Rangitata candidate Elaine Naidu Franz, 29th on the list, had offered to stand down after 1News brought her previous comments to Seymour’s attention today.
Seymour said he accepted her offer on the spot.
The party leader was still confident in Act’s candidate vetting process. He said it was impossible to check a candidate’s entire online history and noted how it was likely old online comments resurfacing would be a growing problem for New Zealand politics.
“At some point as a society, we have to deal with that,” he said.
Seymour said some people who had applied to be candidates were rejected due to historical comments they’d made. He couldn’t say whether those comments had been primarily Covid-related."
|
|
|
Working for families is failing |
Posted by: Lilith7 - 21-08-2023, 03:40 PM - Forum: Opinion and Politics
- Replies (2)
|
|
We really need govt to sort this problem once & for all rather than constantly tinkering around the edges. Removing Neo Liberalism would be an excellent start.
Just damn well fix it - NOW.
There is no good reason to leave things as they are, not when kids are going hungry.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/kahu/working-...BV3JAWUT4/
Susan St John
"For the last two decades critics have seen Working for Families as discriminatory, poorly-designed, far too complex and woefully ineffective at addressing the worst child poverty.
In 2004, the Child Poverty Action Group (of which I am a founding member) explained what was so wrong in a publication called Cut Price Kids and the group has been campaigning to fix Working For Families (WFF) ever since.
The main part of WFF is the per child, per week Family Tax Credit that goes to all caregivers in low-income families on the same basis. This is the best tool to ensure income adequacy. The second component, confusingly named the “In-Work Tax Credit”, is added to the Family Tax Credit weekly payment, but only when parents are eligible on paid work criteria.
While fixed hours of work no longer have to be met, if there is any benefit or part-benefit paid, then the children of those parents cannot have any of the In-Work Tax Credit.
As a result, about 200,000 of the worst-off children in New Zealand miss out on a substantial part of WFF - at least $72.50 a week.
The reasoning has been that paid work is the only way out of poverty and therefore their parents need an incentive to work.
Parents are not on benefits for fun. Their children are four times more likely than other children to live in poverty - that means going without the basics, not enough money after rent to pay for school uniforms or the power bill, let alone nutritious food.
Many of these families are sole parents, many have disabled children or there is sickness in the family. They have few job opportunities and lack support of all kinds. Even if they manage a part-time job, their part-benefit makes their children ineligible for the In-Work Tax Credit.
When a payment to a caregiver is designed to be enough to address child poverty but it is withheld from the worst-off families who are on benefits to create a work incentive, the result is deeper child poverty, not more parents off-benefit."
|
|
|
Idiots dressing in KKK costumes |
Posted by: Lilith7 - 21-08-2023, 11:41 AM - Forum: News and Current Affairs
- Replies (9)
|
|
How the hell can anyone be either so very ignorant or so very uncaring about the reaction from their costumes.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/bay-of-plenty/30...vent-spark
a"A group of people dressing as the Ku Klux Klan for a quiz night community event has sparked outrage in Kaimai.
When a local heard what had happened he was shocked by “the abhorrent behaviour”, and concerned that nobody had stopped the group from taking part.
A spokesperson for the quiz organisers, the Kaimai Settlers Committee, said that they did not remove the group as no one complained at the time.
“We as a committee were immediately concerned when the ‘young guys concerned’ entered late. We had discussed removing them. However, nobody approached anyone with concerns at the time or throughout the night. Had they have, we would have acted.”
The organisers have now approached the group and “strongly suggested they front with an explanation and apology for their actions”.
On a local Kaimai community page locals showed their disapproval, one commenting that it was “insensitive and distasteful”.
Others expressed concern that nobody stood up and protested about the outfits at the time."
https://www.webworm.co/p/nokkk
spAs I sat on a plane for 12 hours hoping my back would cooperate on a cramped seat, some New Zealanders decided to dress up in KKK outfits for a pub quiz in my old hometown of Tauranga. I just spoke to a woman who attended, who was still sort of shell shocked.
“The team walked in — they were one of the last to arrive,” she told me. She didn’t want to be named. I get it.
“I had my back to the door, but there was an audible reaction so I looked round and was really shocked. I sort of thought it must be something else at first — that just looked like the KKK. But no.”
“Their team name was ‘Give us a klu’. The majority of them kept their hoods on the entire night so even if I’d known them, I couldn’t have identified them. They had a petrol can on their table which was an interesting touch. And the emcee gave them a prize for commitment to their costume because they weren’t taking them off even to drink.”
Prize in hand, they left into the Tauranga nigh
New d excuses for people to show their utter lack of understanding. That’s the kindest reading. There are less kind readings. I’m trying to remain impartial but failing.
You’d think it would stop at the people who dress up. A bad decision that will be rebuked by others.
Instead they’re handed prizes by organisers. They are celebrated."
|
|
|
|